View in browser

In this issue

•

Series: AI in Employment Law - AI and the Employment Life Cycle: Attracting, recruiting and onboarding talent

•

Government has published new technical guidance for employers on neonatal care leave and pay 

•

When is someone “disabled” under the Equality Act - and why timing matters 

•

Recent client question: We've just started a disciplinary investigation, and the employee accused of gross misconduct has admitted it. Do we need to continue with the investigation, or can we move straight to a hearing?

 

Welcome to Employment Today

 

Here's our latest Employment newsletter, we hope you will find it useful. If you have any feedback, please send it through by replying to this email.

 

Happening now: react now

 

Series: AI in Employment Law - AI and the Employment Life Cycle: Attracting, recruiting and onboarding talent

 
 

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used across the early stages of the employment life cycle – specifically when attracting, recruiting, and onboarding talent. Our recent article –  available here –  outlines how employers are using AI in talent acquisition processes. It also examines the legal risks involved and it provides advice on how to mitigate such risks.

 
 

If you found this article helpful, please let us know to help shape future editions. 

 

Vote here.

 
 

Can post-employment detriments arising from whistleblowing disclosures fall within whistleblowing laws? 

 
 

On 6 April 2025, the Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Act 2023 (the Act) came into force. As we detailed in our article published at the time (available here), the Act allows eligible parents, who have a baby that is receiving neonatal care for at least one week within 28 days of their birth, to take up to a maximum of 12 weeks of paid leave.

 

The Government has recently issued new technical guidance on the Act, which provides commentary on the following key points:

•

Neonatal care leave (NCL) and neonatal care pay (NCP) are available to a range of parents, including the baby's biological parents, adopting parents, intended parents in a surrogacy arrangement, partners and surrogate birth mothers;

 

•

Statutory NCP can be claimed by employers retrospectively in circumstances where eligible employees took time off without being aware that they were entitled to take the time off as NCL and NCP;

 

•

The accrual of NCL and NCP in circumstances, such as, where a baby has multiple admissions into neonatal care, or where an employee has had multiple births within a pregnancy (for example, the employee had had twins where one or both have been admitted into neonatal care), and those babies are subject to separate periods of neonatal care or there is crossover in their periods of neonatal care; 

 

•

The coordination of NCL and NCP with other family-related leave entitlements, such as maternity leave, paternity leave, shared parental leave and pay, adoption leave and parental bereavement leave; and

 

•

Information that employers must record on statutory NCP for HMRC compliance.

The technical guidance provides valuable support for employers in understanding, and complying with, the Act's requirements. We also recommend that employers: (1) update their family-related leave policies to include an NCL and NCP policy; and (2) provide training to managers and HR teams to ensure that they are fully equipped to handle any requests from employees on NCL and NCP. If your organisation requires any support with NCL and NCP, please contact Hannah Meehan or your usual contact in the Employment team.

 
 

If you found this article helpful, please let us know to help shape future editions. 

 

Vote here.

 

Case study

 

When is someone “disabled” under the Equality Act - and why timing matters 

 
 

A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decision in JP v Spelthorne Borough Council confirms that tribunals can decide disability status early in proceedings and without defining every allegation of discrimination. Both the ET and EAT agreed that the claimant was not disabled during the relevant period, as her health issues were linked to a specific work situation and were not likely to last 12 months or recur.    

 

If you would like to know what this means for employers and why timing and pleadings are important, click here to read our LinkedIn post.

 
 

If you found this article helpful, please let us know to help shape future editions. 

 

Vote here.

 

Recent client question

 

Q: We've just started a disciplinary investigation, and the employee accused of gross misconduct has admitted it. Do we need to continue with the investigation, or can we move straight to a hearing?

A: You should finish the investigation. Although it’s likely the investigation won’t take as long, it could unearth mitigating circumstances or simply cast doubt over the truthfulness of a confession (which whilst rare, does sometimes occur when pressure is being applied by a line manager, or sometimes to preserve the employment of a friend or family member).

 

This week's authors

 

Lynsey Blyth

Partner

 

Contact

+44 (0) 771 009 3962

Email

 

Henry Cross

Senior Associate

 

Contact

+44 (0) 771 506 9467

Email

 

Hannah Meehan

Associate

 

Contact

+44 (0) 756 170 0608

Email

 
Michelmores

Preferences | Forward | Unsubscribe

 

Michelmores LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA authorisation number 463401) and registered in England and Wales under Partnership No. OC326242. The registered office is Woodwater House, Pynes Hill, Exeter, EX2 5WR. To view our privacy policy please click here.

LinkedIn   |   Facebook   |   Instagram