Construction Law Publications
Funders providing development finance will each attach different conditions to their lending. A common condition, however, is for the funder to require a legal route of recourse against the contractor and his sub contractors and the members of the professional team appointed to carry out development. This article highlights the steps you can take to increase the likelihood of your being able to satisfy this common condition.
Enforcement of Adjudications: Dredging up Uncertainty
You may already know of the peculiar nature of adjudication. As far as construction disputes are concerned, it is a method of obtaining answers to specific questions, posed to the adjudicator at the outset, within a limited timeframe (normally 28 days). The emphasis is on getting to an answer, not necessarily the correctness of that answer.
Expert Witnesses' Immunity: On Its Last Legs?
First solicitors lost their age-old protection from being sued for negligence in litigation. Then it became possible to sue your barrister if his advice was negligent. Consequently, apart from the judge himself, the only party who still has immunity from being sued in respect of their performance in connection with court proceedings is a party's expert.
Where it is impractical to impose an absolute obligation upon a party to do or achieve something, the parties will often look to impose a lesser obligation in the form of either best or reasonable endeavours, but what's the difference?
It is thought that by 2011 the construction related parts of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 will be replaced by the new provisions of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009. The relevant part of the Act is not yet in force however, pending issue of the necessary commencement order.
Can a Builder Owe a Duty of Care in Tort to His Client in Respect of Economic Loss?
In the recent Technology and Construction Court case of Robinson v P E Jones (Contractors) Ltd [2010] it was decided that a builder can owe a duty of care to his client in relation to economic loss. The Judge found that in principle the building contract between a builder and an owner could itself give rise to a special relationship of proximity, and consequently resulted in liability in tort to the owner for pure economic loss.
Displaying results 1 - 10 of 18 Results
Page [1] 2



